0 results for 'Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani'
$72 Million Dallas Verdict Came After Nearly 1,000 Court Filings
A critical hurdle in getting to a just verdict was overcoming the Walker companies' shell game to use workers compensation insurance as a bar, plaintiffs' attorney Charla Aldous said.Two Federal Courts Side With Otis Elevator Co. in Hotel Lift Malfunction Lawsuits
In separate rulings by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and the Eastern District of Virginia, both judges ruled in favor of Otis Elevator Co. after the plaintiffs in each suit were injured in hotel elevators and attempted to hold the company accountable for negligence.Newsmakers: J.D. Silva & Associates Announces New Firm Managing Partner Armando Córdova
Tracking ins and the outs of Texas Lawyers.Gordon Rees Expands in Pittsburgh, Adds 11 Attorneys From Burns White
"We saw that they have a clientele that is particularly suited to be serviced by a national law firm," Gordon Rees Pittsburgh office co-managing partner Manoj Jegasothy said of the new group.View more book results for the query "Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani"
$88K in Attorney Fees Wiped Out in Improperly Pled Bitcoin Suit
Coinmint, a cryptocurrency mining company, was denied attorney fees for work performed in Delaware, but retained its right by default judgment to buy out Mintvest's interest in the company.Improperly Pled Bitcoin Suit Leads to $88K in Attorney Fees Being Wiped Out
Coinmint presented itself in a Texas state court to follow up on litigation that took place in Delaware and Puerto Rico, primarily to enforce its right to collect on a Delaware court judgment.Although defendant prevailed on some claims asserted by plaintiff, plaintiff was the prevailing party in the overall litigation as the central issue in the case was the validity and enforceability of the parties' contracts, and thus plaintiff was entitled to legal fees and costs under the contractual fee-shifting provisions.
Illinois Appellate Court Revives Birth Defects Suit Against Motorola Solutions
The court sided with plaintiffs on their negligence and willful and wanton claims against Motorola after alleging they were born with severe birth defects as a result of their parents' exposure to reproductively toxic chemicals while being employed at Motorola-owned semiconductor manufacturing facilities in Arizona and Texas.State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now
Creating a Culture of Compliance
Brought to you by Ironclad
Download Now
A Buyer's Guide to Law Firm Software
Brought to you by PracticePanther
Download Now